
Menu
Persuasion and global warming
But first, some data:
Sea levels, Greenhouse effect, temp and CO2, temp changes over space, CO2 over time
Pre-persuasion–framing the debate
- Carbon dioxide–greenhouse gas or best friend?
- Fox News, politics, and climate change
- Polar bears and NRDC
- Advertising’s important contributions
- Greg Craven, Oregon HS teacher, and risk
- Perception of balance
Source credibility
- Fox cherrypicking a scientist’s views (meet Steven Hayward), a clinical psychologist critiquing Greta Thunberg’s activism, grandstanding in Congress, the occasional propaganda film from the Heartland Institute (check out Legates and Soon’s credibility), etc.
- Al Gore’s documentary, An Inconvenient Truth
- Discrediting works, too (climategate, Al Gore)
- Scientific consensus
- Greg Craven’s ‘credibility spectrum‘
Message control
- Global warming vs climate change
- Each’side’ has language that it uses in public discourse
- Climate deniers, global warming, climate disruption, front groups/astroturf/greenwash, fossil fuels, renewable energy
- Global warming alarmists, climate change, theory, climategate (trying to tie a ‘scandal’ to Watergate–see above link), Medieval warming period (i.e., pre-industrial warming suggests humans aren’t involved), global cooling, clean coal, energy security, climate police
Appeal to emotion (mostly fear)
- Bedtime stories, two versions
- Anger–Glenn Beck climate scientist plugs a book, talks to a TV weatherman, and fires up his audience
- Using children (Oncoming train ; Dreams of tomorrow; children and polar bears
- Death and destruction