This is a key part of the course, worth 150 out of 500 possible points. This is where you show me you’re reading, engaging in the material (readings, discussion, and online lecture material), and learning. Students need to participate in the discussion every week to gain points for that week. Here’s what I’ll be looking for:

1. At least one substantial posting on each discussion thread I begin (there will usually be 1-2 per week).
2. At least two meaningful responses in each discussion thread to a post from someone else in class. Demonstrate that you’ve been following the thread and have something thoughtful to add. Posts should show you have completed the readings and the online lecture material. This part of the grade is worth 12 points/week. This is a discussion forum, not a posting board. It happens week-to-week. Treat it as such and you will earn more points, and learn more.
3. Thoughtful postings. I’m looking for evidence of thought on your part. Include opinion, as long as you demonstrate how it is informed by the assigned material. If I can’t tell whether you’ve even read the material, don’t expect many points. Gratuitous posts (‘ditto!’) keep us going, I like to see people support each other, but they’re more an act of kindness and courtesy than a source of points.

Weekly, there are 15 points possible  for participation in discussion. Some basic guidelines:

1. You need to post during the week the discussion is taking place. Once I’ve graded threads for the week, I don’t go back—you’ll have to follow instructions for making up a discussion forum (below).
2. Courtesy and respect. Keep it civil. We don’t have to agree—but we can disagree in a civil way. Use persuasion, logic and evidence to support your ideas. This is important for your own professional growth—learning how to disagree with tact and grace. We can discuss and exchange ideas. We’re here to support everyone’s participation, but yours shouldn’t discourage others from doing so.
3. If you’re writing a long post, use paragraphs to break up points and (warning!), to be safe, you might write it in a word document (and save as you go), and then paste it into Canvas—this will help you avoid the trauma of losing a post you’ve spent considerable time composing.

So, you can:

• pose a question for the group, then try to answer it or explain why you asked it.
• provide other research or web resources you’ve found that shed light on a subject we’ve discussing.
• summarize a long discussion thread and try to distill it down to one or a few issues.
• reply to others’ postings—either agreeing or disagreeing, the main thing is that you provide evidence and some logical argument to back up what you’re saying.
• show us more than your ungrounded opinion—simply expressing what you think without reference to the reading material isn’t learning, or at least not the kind that will merit notice and a decent grade.

Discussion points will be based on the following criteria:

• Thoughtful reflection on readings. Use them as evidence to support your ideas. Some degree of chatter about a topic is fine, but not at the expense of demonstrating real learning.
• Your grasp of the topic. You don’t necessarily need to show mastery of each reading or topic. After all, you’re here to learn. But you do need to show effort, and this includes asking questions where you’re unclear to clarify your understanding and show me your effort in acquiring the material. ‘I don’t get it’ won’t garner many points (you can expand and discuss what you do get, though).
• Clear communication of your ideas. I expect clear, organized writing. Complete sentences, spell-checked, etc. If you’re citing something, do it correctly, give us a web page. Read over your post before submitting.
• Bringing in outside materials. Always appreciated, but you should evaluate a source’s credibility. If it’s the first .com site you found on Google, it’s often obvious.

A note on absence from class: If you’re going to be away from the Web for any substantial period of time, please let me know. If you’re not posting and haven’t notified me, I’ll just assume you’re not participating in the discussion threads for that week (and that’s 12 points per week plus three possible for writing), so if, for example, you missed three weeks entirely, your chances of pulling an ‘A’ in the course would be very slim—that’s 45 pts out of a possible 500 for the term). You can make up two weeks of discussions.

Making up discussion. Limited to two—otherwise there’s no discussion, just dropping in posts for points. But you can make up two if need be with reflection papers, following the basic guidelines below, demonstrating you have completed readings, lecture material, and read the discussion threads. Don’t just drop posts in after I’ve graded—I won’t read them (but you can incorporate them into your make-ups).

Again, 150 points on this part of the course—15 pts per week.

Participation—Weekly share (discussion)

This is a separate thread. Use it to share something interesting, and hopefully related to class, that you came across during the week in consuming media. Doesn’t have to be the news—any form of media (radio, podcasts, web, cinema, streaming content, TV, print, billboard, etc.). But make it interesting and compelling. I’m trying to find new ways to encourage community in the online setting. We all can have unique takes on media—show us yours, we will all learn something over the term about how we consume media.

40 points possible—4 pts per week

Writing in discussion forums

I expect college-level writing. There will be three points possible each week for writing in the discussion forums, meaning you need to proofread your posts, check for spelling errors, capitalize, all that basic grammar-related stuff, use paragraphs for readability, make sure that they make. A ‘3’ means your posts are in order, make sense, thoughts are well-organized, and you’ve probably done some proofreading before hitting the ‘submit’ button. A ‘2’ means you’ve probably done some proofreading, but there are still some pretty glaring errors. ‘1’ means it’s not really clear you’ve proofread the posts for the week. I’m doing this because writing is critical to finding work, communicating with prospective employers, and we all need to show some self-awareness about our writing.
Note: This will show up as a separate grade for each week of the course. You’ll see this as an assignment, but there’s nothing to submit—it simply comes due the same page the discussion forums for the week are due. You cannot receive full credit if you don’t participate in all threads for the week.

3 points possible per week, 30 points total for the term.

Making up a week’s discussion (you’re entitled to two)

Make up papers should be no less than 3 pages, double-spaced (11 or 12 pt font) in length. This is how to structure them:

1. What for you were the most important points that you took from the readings, discussion and lecture material for the week? What is the ‘big picture?’ You should touch on each reading assignment, discuss any common threads between them, or differences. I want to see what you gleaned from readings and the week’s topic, gauge your depth of understanding. I’m not looking for book reports—do some summary, but your paper should be no more than 1/3 summary (and no less than 2/3 analysis).
2. Demonstrate you read the discussion threads. Demonstrate you went through the threads, and show what you learned. How did the conversation go? Keep in mind—take a stand, but don’t make points if you’re not going to support them with evidence or logic. And cite your sources.

Standards. This is making up for your having missed the discussion boards, so I expect the same amount of intellectual effort to go into the make-up. Good writing, use of complete sentences, paragraphs to change ideas, citing of authors’ works at the end. Submit it in Canvas (Wk 11 module).