Summary outline

The week’s material

  • Assistance?
    • from whom to whom (multilateral, bilateral, NGO …)?
    • for what (economic, institution and infrastructure building, health, education …)?
    • Strings attached (yes, ‘aid’ often isn’t freely predicated on conditions from donor)?
  • Where did the concept come from?
    • Colonialism (more on this next week)
    • Post WWII [Cold War + Reconstruction] + Bretton Woods [Marshall Plan] >World Bank
    • US food and trade policies
    • Decolonization (Boserup and European rule) AfricaAsiaAmericas
  • Assumptions
  • Dudley Seers–‘realization of personality‘ (an alternative critique); and at a minimum:
    • food
    • livelihood
    • equality
  • Measuring development
    • Considerations–cost, validity (are we measuring what we say we’re measuring?), reliability (are our measurements accurate?), quantitative vs qualitative dimensions, comparability across societies, global vs disaggregated measures
    • Do ‘global’ (meaning high-level, national averages, etc.) measures mask deepening poverty? If so, how?
    • Gapminder and the progress of 200 years
  • Language of development
    • industrial/non-industrial, developed/undeveloped/developing, low/medium/high income, poor/rich, advanced/ backwards, modernity/tradition . . . North/South
  • Meaning of development?
    • Gandhi: The realization of human potential
    • Brundtland Commission (a UN project on sustainable development); Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (improvement in human welfare, quality of life, and social well being)
    • Elements? Values? Preconditions (e.g., democracy)?
    • Key concepts: human rights, choice, equality and equity, agency, participation, etc.
  • In practice
    • (according to Maggie Black) Means to reinforce existing political power structures
      • Does Black then suggest development reflects (neo) colonialism?
    • Ethnocentric
    • Process controlled by countries of the North
    • Corruption, dysfunction, ‘weak states’
  • Elements ….
    • Minimum: Food, livelihood, equality (from Seers)
    • Eliminating poverty
    • Equity, fairness
    • Expanding choice, freedoms (freedom ‘from’ and freedom ‘to’), dignity
    • Self-determination
    • Infrastructure
    • Participation in social and civic life
    • Realizing human potential
    • Sustainability
  • Structure and Agency
    • ‘Development’ may be controlled by countries of the North, but there is a professional cadre of development professionals–scholars and practitioners–who believe fervently in the loftiest ideals and potentials of redressing global inequality, reducing poverty, and helping citizens achieve some measure of self-determination.
    • In other words, the structure of geopolitical power that favors countries of the North often leaves little leverage for committed professionals and politicians in-country to achieve or define for themselves what ‘development’ is or how to go about it.