
Menu
Summary
Relationship between economic activity and development potential
- planning and estimations;
- agricultural policies;
- policies affecting informal sector
- research: e.g., study of savings and consumption patterns, household dynamics
- time poverty issues
- Policy benefits: good data leads to better policy
Historical forces
Urbanization, migration (comes with industrialization, ‘development’)
- ‘Push’ and ‘pull’ factors
- Rural vs urban life and adjustment
- International migration
- Those who stay behind?
Sectors affecting women
- Subsistence-we’ve talked a bit about this one …
- Domestic-labor within the household, unpaid
- Volunteer-rotating labor associations, RoSCAs-what’s the difference between volunteering for a charity and making a financial donation?
- Informal
What is the informal sector?
- Unregistered with tax authorities (don’t pay taxes)
- self-employment
- ease of entry
- scale
- labor-intensive
- access issues (market, credit, labor)
Where things get counted makes a difference
The same jobs can be done, for instance cooking, sewing, cleaning:
- for pay in the formal sector,
- irregularly in the informal sector for pay, and
- in the domestic sector for no pay,
- How we measure economic activity affects perceived size of economy
Factors influencing participation
- gender (the lowest wage, non-managerial jobs)
- formal education (least educated)
- age (young and productive)
- ethnicity (ethnic minorities prevail)
Why is this important?
- growing fast
- gendered
- safety valve for many on margins
- unregulated, insecure
- less visible
- ‘free trade zones’ (taxes reduced, regulations eased, for factories)
- ‘capital flight’ (how much profit re-invested when production is for export?)
- Ownership can matter (multinationals vs nationals–less pressure on nationals, e.g., Bangladesh factory collapse)
- Role of patriarchy in ensuring docile, low-wage working class of poor women and girls
- Are these more than ‘jobs?’ Do they transform relations, women’s economic welfare?
Women and international migration: A more recent trend (from Hochschild)
- The ‘brain drain‘–what is it?
- The ‘care drain’–how different?
- Increasing inequality between North and South–e.g., North countries on average 46 times richer in 1980, versus 20 times richer in 1960; sixty countries worse off economically in 1999 than in 1980;
- Professional women in the North vs South–personal choice, or structural pressures?
- Underemployment in the South–the ‘push’ factor (what’s the ‘pull?’ Incentives to hire women from the South?)–avg age of 29 years for those immigrating to US; most have children
- Value of care, passing it on to other caregivers, like a chain
- Single mothers seem to predominate; women from third world seen as more ‘caring,’ ‘loving’
- Care as decontextualized (removed from its context, in other words–those who provide it, those who provide care for them, what’s required to immigrate, etc.)
- Extraction of ‘services’ versus goods, but still the flow is from South to North
- Development as a ‘push’ factor (as well as underdevelopment)
- Market street life
- Dakha street scene
- Lagos street scene
- from a taxi
- food vendors on a public bus
- street food
- Mumbai
Graphs:
- As income grows, what happens to inequality?
- As countries urbanize, what happens to CO2 emissions?
- Do tax revenues increase with growth of ag sector?
- Women, agriculture and industry