Summary

Relationship between economic activity and development potential

  • planning and estimations;
  • agricultural policies;
  • policies affecting informal sector
  • research: e.g., study of savings and consumption patterns, household dynamics
  • time poverty issues
  • Policy benefits: good data leads to better policy

Historical forces

Urbanization, migration (comes with industrialization, ‘development’)

  • ‘Push’ and ‘pull’ factors
  • Rural vs urban life and adjustment
  • International migration
  • Those who stay behind?

Sectors affecting women

  • Subsistence-we’ve talked a bit about this one …
  • Domestic-labor within the household, unpaid
  • Volunteer-rotating labor associations, RoSCAs-what’s the difference between volunteering for a charity and making a financial donation?
  • Informal

What is the informal sector?

  • Unregistered with tax authorities (don’t pay taxes)
  • self-employment
  • ease of entry
  • scale
  • labor-intensive
  • access issues (market, credit, labor)

Where things get counted makes a difference

The same jobs can be done, for instance cooking, sewing, cleaning:

  • for pay in the formal sector,
  • irregularly in the informal sector for pay, and
  • in the domestic sector for no pay,
  • How we measure economic activity affects perceived size of economy

Factors influencing participation

  • gender (the lowest wage, non-managerial jobs)
  • formal education (least educated)
  • age (young and productive)
  • ethnicity (ethnic minorities prevail)

Why is this important?

  • growing fast
  • gendered
  • safety valve for many on margins
  • unregulated, insecure
  • less visible

Factory work

  • ‘free trade zones’ (taxes reduced, regulations eased, for factories)
  • ‘capital flight’ (how much profit re-invested when production is for export?)
  • Ownership can matter (multinationals vs nationals–less pressure on nationals, e.g., Bangladesh factory collapse)
  • Role of patriarchy in ensuring docile, low-wage working class of poor women and girls
  • Are these more than ‘jobs?’ Do they transform relations, women’s economic welfare?

Women and international migration: A more recent trend (from Hochschild)

  • The ‘brain drain‘–what is it?
  • The ‘care drain’–how different?
  • Increasing inequality between North and South–e.g., North countries on average 46 times richer in 1980, versus 20 times richer in 1960; sixty countries worse off economically in 1999 than in 1980;
  • Professional women in the North vs South–personal choice, or structural pressures?
  • Underemployment in the South–the ‘push’ factor (what’s the ‘pull?’ Incentives to hire women from the South?)–avg age of 29 years for those immigrating to US; most have children
  • Value of care, passing it on to other caregivers, like a chain
  • Single mothers seem to predominate; women from third world seen as more ‘caring,’ ‘loving’
  • Care as decontextualized (removed from its context, in other words–those who provide it, those who provide care for them, what’s required to immigrate, etc.)
  • Extraction of ‘services’ versus goods, but still the flow is from South to North
  • Development as a ‘push’ factor (as well as underdevelopment)

 Graphs: