Giddens and Bourdieu

Giddens and structuration

Practice, consciousness and structure are simultaneous creations—part of the process of structuration

Implications? Structures have plasticity

  • Rationalization—process of developing routines
  • Discursive consciousness (symbolic interactionism?)—ability to express actions in language
  • Practical consciousness—more habitual, taken for granted actions (Berger and Luckman?)
  • Structuration—at the moment of action, people are producing and reproducing structure
  • Agency and structure have duality
  • Margaret Archer’s theory, critique—structure and agency are not two sides of the same coin, can’t adequately be explained and understood unless they can be thought of as dualistic

Bourdieu

  • Structure over agency—there is agency, there are agents, but they’re conditioned
  • Reflexive sociology (infinite regress?)
  • Habitus
    • cognitive apparatus for dealing with social world; product of internalizing structures
    • importance of time—usually takes time occupying a certain position
    • internalization of external structures; externalization of internal ones—dialectic
    • habitus is like ideal type for individual—who ultimately chooses (superego?)—but the choices turn out to be structured
    • practice—the logic of practice replaces the rational selfish actor
    • Plasticity—the social world is complex and changes
  • Field—network of relations (e.g., higher education, sports, medicine)
    • Arena of struggle among people, organized in various ways
    • Defend present position or improve
    • Types of capital—economic, cultural, symbolic, social
    • Symbolic violence (e.g., education system’s role in reproducing status quo)
    • Habitus drives strategies used
    • Field conditions the habitus, but the habitus recognizes value in the field
    • Taste as a matchmaker (think of it as a field)