Menu
Giddens and Bourdieu
Giddens and structuration
Practice, consciousness and structure are simultaneous creations—part of the process of structuration
Implications? Structures have plasticity
- Rationalization—process of developing routines
- Discursive consciousness (symbolic interactionism?)—ability to express actions in language
- Practical consciousness—more habitual, taken for granted actions (Berger and Luckman?)
- Structuration—at the moment of action, people are producing and reproducing structure
- Agency and structure have duality
- Margaret Archer’s theory, critique—structure and agency are not two sides of the same coin, can’t adequately be explained and understood unless they can be thought of as dualistic
Bourdieu
- Structure over agency—there is agency, there are agents, but they’re conditioned
- Reflexive sociology (infinite regress?)
- Habitus
- cognitive apparatus for dealing with social world; product of internalizing structures
- importance of time—usually takes time occupying a certain position
- internalization of external structures; externalization of internal ones—dialectic
- habitus is like ideal type for individual—who ultimately chooses (superego?)—but the choices turn out to be structured
- practice—the logic of practice replaces the rational selfish actor
- Plasticity—the social world is complex and changes
- Field—network of relations (e.g., higher education, sports, medicine)
- Arena of struggle among people, organized in various ways
- Defend present position or improve
- Types of capital—economic, cultural, symbolic, social
- Symbolic violence (e.g., education system’s role in reproducing status quo)
- Habitus drives strategies used
- Field conditions the habitus, but the habitus recognizes value in the field
- Taste as a matchmaker (think of it as a field)